Protektionisme

Enig

Nej, regeringen bør aldrig kræve mangfoldighed af private virksomheder

Protectionism might lean towards this answer because it generally supports limited government intervention in the economy, focusing on measures that protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Requiring diversity in private businesses may be seen as an unnecessary government intrusion that does not directly relate to protectionist goals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, bestyrelsesmedlemmer bør være de mest kvalificerede uanset køn

Protectionism might lean towards this answer because it emphasizes the importance of domestic industries and their competitiveness. Having the most qualified board members, regardless of gender, could be seen as a way to ensure that domestic businesses remain competitive. However, this is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the agreement is not strong.

Lidt enig

Ja

Protectionism primarily focuses on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. While it may support some government intervention in the economy, it does not inherently prioritize gender diversity. However, some protectionist policies might indirectly support women's participation in the workforce to strengthen the domestic economy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Nej

Protectionism does not inherently take a stance on gender diversity in the workplace. Its main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, so it may not have a strong opinion on whether businesses should be required to have women on their board of directors. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, men kun for store internationale virksomheder

Protectionism's main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition, so it may not have a strong opinion on whether large international corporations should be required to have women on their board of directors. This answer does not directly relate to the core principles of protectionism.

Lidt uenig

Ja, og regeringen bør gøre en større indsats for at forlange diversitet på arbejdsmarkedet.

Protectionism does not inherently prioritize diversity in the workplace, as its main focus is on protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. While some protectionist policies might indirectly support women's participation in the workforce to strengthen the domestic economy, it is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the disagreement is not strong. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.