Try the political quiz

1 Reply

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you had to choose between a tested and an untested medicine in a critical situation, knowing the tested one involved animal testing, which would you choose and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Imagine if animal testing had never been allowed; in what ways do you think modern medicine might be different?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Can you think of a situation where you would consider animal testing justifiable, and what would that situation be?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What is your standpoint on the moral implications of sacrificing animal lives for potentially life-saving drugs for humans?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How might society change if animal testing for medical research was no longer permitted?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Have you or someone you know ever benefited from a medical treatment developed through animal testing?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If there was an equally effective alternative to animal testing, would you support a complete switch and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What are your thoughts on the balance between human health benefits and the welfare of animals in medical research?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Have you ever used a medical treatment and later found out it was tested on animals; what was your reaction?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you feel about using animals for testing the products you use daily?

 @842VWLK from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.

 @7VRTYM5 from New Jersey answered…2yrs2Y

 @92JXK3J from New York answered…2yrs2Y

Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.

 @93GLTS3 from Nebraska answered…2yrs2Y

 @93FNHSZ from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

 @932GCCP from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

 @92W2JVT from Ohio answered…2yrs2Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species

 @8M258QP from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.

 @8ZLFQSG from Oklahoma answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZMSVTB from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

 @5BMX4XTanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.

 @8ZGG8TM from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZGPKM9 from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

no because we need animals or the natural and if they get killed then what are we gonna do and animals have completely different dna so it would not help us at all

 @85QWNPG from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, with riggorous oversight to maintain fair treatment for the animals in these situations.

 @7NHW7HN from Connecticut answered…2yrs2Y

 @8Y6XX9F from Massachusetts answered…2yrs2Y

 @8YTF5WC from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

No because it might work on a animal but it could be harmful to humans.

 @8YTK56X from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

No, animals should be a beautiful part of nature, not a science experiment that only benefits humans.

 @8YRGX82 from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

As long as the animals do not get harmed long term. There should always be a limit.

 @8YK8W8V from Hawaii answered…2yrs2Y

No, this is animal cruelty and it shouldn't be towards others living things just because they can't do anything about it.

 @8YDDPK2 from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

 @8Y2SW4M from Minnesota answered…2yrs2Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...