Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

Yes

Have you ever thought about how international money transfers impact people’s freedom to help loved ones across borders?

In your opinion, should governments restrict financial transactions with certain countries if it affects innocent people trying to survive?

Do you think being able to send money across borders without using banks gives more freedom to the average person, or does it create more risks?

How would you feel if international sanctions meant you couldn’t financially support family members in another country, even during a crisis?

Can technology like cryptocurrency really solve the struggles people face with traditional banks when transferring money internationally?

Do you think preventing cross-border payments because of security concerns outweighs the personal needs of individuals who are in difficult situations?

How do you balance the need for national security with the ability for families to stay financially connected in countries under sanctions?

Is bypassing government restrictions with cryptocurrencies a form of fighting for personal freedom, or does it create new dangers?

How do you think cross-border payment systems should prioritize human rights while still respecting international laws and sanctions?

Do you believe there should be exceptions to financial restrictions when humanitarian aid is at stake, or are these rules too important to bend?

The repairs stepping stones make my bones wider should ofac sending off money formed over citizens bans as said government feedback admins