Euthanasia, the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering, is currently considered a criminal offense.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@8YT6XX73yrs3Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@8ZY2RKD2yrs2Y
No only for extreme situations
@8YX4JT93yrs3Y
If life is only causing a patient pain, then the decision for them to end their life is morally okay.
@93ZP8QG2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice. I personally disagree with euthanasia, but it should remain a personal choice.
@8TP6QKS3yrs3Y
No, but they should not be prevented from ending their own lives without assistance
@8QG5XSM4yrs4Y
only if they are in pain on a daily basis
@8X3KQBN3yrs3Y
No, I think instead they should be helped any way they can and prevent suicides if possible.
@6HM8ZBP3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if there is zero chance of recovery, and they are found to be in a sound psychological state following an examination
@7W3SBDC4yrs4Y
This is more of a state choice.
@7GLVLCC4yrs4Y
They can't survive and had a psychological workup.
@89CDM9C3yrs3Y
Only in cases where the patient is facing an imminent painful death.
@842VWLK3yrs3Y
no, life is precious even when terminally ill
@Davidc03024yrs4Y
Yes, and extent this right to non-ill individuals
@8CYG8KL4yrs4Y
While it is inhumane, it is more inhumane to let someone suffer in the hellish abyss that is terminal mental illness, if there is a chance they can be saved, then we should try for a certain amount of time, the amount of time depends on the illness, but if it's impossible, then don't let them suffer.
@8DP6P7F4yrs4Y
They should in theory, but right now we don't have the resources to morally do this, some people end up having to go earlier than they wanted because they may no be able to give consent at the time that they intended to die.
@8FB9K6P4yrs4Y
Yes, assisted suicide should be allowed in general.
@8FPLGKD4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if the medical professional also consents to performing the procedure.
@giannadavison8884yrs4Y
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness or they are in extreme pain.
@8H2G98J4yrs4Y
This is something I don't feel comfortable having a strong opinion on.
@8JN8BGC4yrs4Y
Only if they don't want to be on life support or are brain dead.
@8L2DQDJ4yrs4Y
yes but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice
@8L55CZ74yrs4Y
This is only up to the person, and should not be a political issue.
@NotShaggy34yrs4Y
Yes, but only if they go through a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice.
@buday4vancouver4yrs4Y
Not assisted, if they want to do it themselves, up to them. Leave some cleanup money behind.
@8PZ7LSP4yrs4Y
Even though I disagree with it, allow them to do it if there are no other options
@8QW98GR4yrs4Y
yes but as long as it is completely their choice and no one is indirectly forcing them
@8SLRGMY4yrs4Y
I say yes if that’s what they really wish and how they went to leave the world. It just depends on the person.
@8TLGGNV3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for terminal illnesses
@lucasnat0r3yrs3Y
Yes but only in cases where survival is impossible and life is unbearable.
@8XCJY2Y3yrs3Y
Yes as long as their family is ok with it.
@92T58MH3yrs3Y
family has to be involved in decision
@92MKPWZ3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive and show full understanding of their choice.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...