@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policyStarted 3yrs agoActive 1mo ago

Should the United States provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

Should South Korea provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages.

Answer Overview

Response rates from 51 South Korea voters.

59%
Yes
41%
No
33%
Yes
37%
No
24%
Yes, but only provide humanitarian aid
4%
No, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now
2%
Yes, but decrease the current amount of resources we are providing
0%
No, we should not get involved in this conflict
0%
Yes, but with strict accountability.
0%
No, we cannot afford to give military resources right now
0%
Yes, and increase the current amount of resources we are providing
0%
No, Ukraine should rely on their own resources to defend themselves

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 51 South Korea voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 51 South Korea voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from South Korea voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2ZJBN6answered…1mo1MO

Us president has in handover head Military as defense with NZ prime minister not only supporting Ukraine the Russian aren't never save life's

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Ukrainian Defense Funding” news articles, updated frequently.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

Biden retaliated against a Dem who called for him to step aside

Rep. Hillary Scholten, a first-term Democrat who flipped a traditionally Republican seat in 2022, was booted last week from from a coordinated effort between the the Biden campaign and the state party to elect candidates up and down the ticket, according to four people with knowledge of the situation, who were granted anonymity to speak candidly about private discussions.It happened soon after she called for Biden to step aside, those people said, which angered many Democrats behind the scenes. The Biden campaign was contacted by POLITICO Wednesday evening; Scholten was reinstated Thursday morning.“Rep. Scholten is welcome at the coordinated campaign and we look forward to campaigning with her this fall,” said Mia Ehrenberg, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, when asked about Scholten’s removal from the coordinated campaign.The initial decision to remove Scholten from the joint effort — which would have essentially cut her off from the combined field effort between the presidential, Senate and House races — came from the Michigan state party, according to two people familiar with the discussions. If she had remained excluded from the coordinated effort, it could’ve meant that when Democratic organizers were campaigning in her district, they would tout Biden and the party’s Senate nominee — but not Scholten.The Michigan Democratic Party declined to comment. But two people familiar with discussions said Scholten had specifically infuriated state leaders when she spoke out against Biden — on the same day that the president was already visiting Michigan — without informing them of her plans, according to the two people.“This decision was made in Wilmington, full stop,” a Democratic operative who’s worked on competitive House races said. “Punishing her isn’t just petty and vindictive, it’s self-defeating.”An official for the Biden campaign denied that: “This did not come from Wilmington.”

▲  2014 replies