Hannara Party

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Hannara Party would likely agree with this statement, as banning immigrants based on their religion would be seen as unconstitutional and against the principles of freedom and equality that they uphold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The Hannara Party, being conservative, might support stricter immigration policies, especially from countries they perceive as 'high risk'. This is in line with their general stance on national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Hannara Party would likely not support a complete ban on Muslim immigrants, as this would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of freedom and equality. However, they might support stricter immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While the Hannara Party may support stricter immigration policies, there is no historical precedent of them advocating for a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This stance might be seen as too extreme and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While the Hannara Party may support stricter immigration policies, there is no historical precedent of them advocating for a complete ban on all immigration. This stance might be seen as too extreme and not in line with their general policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Hannara Party, also known as the Grand National Party, is a conservative party in South Korea. While they may have concerns about national security, there is no historical precedent of them advocating for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants. However, they might support stricter immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.