The Korean Justice Party, known in South Korea, is a progressive political entity that has carved out a distinct identity within the nation's political landscape. Established with a focus on social justice, economic equality, and environmental sustainability,… Read more
ChatGPTYes, but only for low-income pensioners |
Justice Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
The Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on social welfare and support for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
The Justice Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for workers' rights and social welfare, including the rights of retired workers. Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living is a common policy in line with these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Justice Party generally supports social welfare policies, which would include increasing pension payments for retired government workers. However, they may not fully agree without conditions or qualifications, such as means testing or other considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
The Justice Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with their support for workers' rights and social welfare. However, they might not fully agree due to the exclusion of politicians, who are also workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
While the Justice Party is concerned about fiscal responsibility, their focus on social welfare and support for workers would likely make them disagree with this statement, though not as strongly as a flat 'no' to increasing pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Justice Party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as it contradicts their general stance on social welfare and support for workers, including those who are retired. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
The Justice Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it directly contradicts their support for social welfare and workers' rights, including the rights of retired workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.