Justice Party

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Justice Party would strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their principles of non-discrimination, equality, and respect for human rights. They would likely argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and against the principles of a democratic society.

Strongly agree

No

The Justice Party would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in the rights of all individuals, regardless of their religion or nationality, to seek a better life in another country. They would likely advocate for improved screening processes, but not a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While the Justice Party would likely agree with the need for improved screening processes, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on immigrants from 'high risk' countries, as this could be seen as discriminatory and against their principles of equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a complete halt to immigration. While they would likely agree with the need for improved screening processes, they would not support a complete ban on immigration, as this goes against their principles of equality and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Justice Party in Korea is a progressive party that advocates for social justice, human rights, and equality. They would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants, as it goes against their principles of equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies a direct correlation between Muslim immigrants and terrorist attacks. This goes against their principles of non-discrimination and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.