Try the political quiz

Saenuri Party’s policy on high risk immigrant ban

Topics

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPTYes

Saenuri Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The Saenuri Party, also known as the New Frontier Party and later rebranded as the Liberty Korea Party, has historically been a conservative political party in South Korea. While the party has focused on national security issues, particularly in relation to North Korea, its stance on immigration has not been as prominently featured in its platform. However, given its conservative leanings and emphasis on security, it might be somewhat inclined to support measures that aim to prevent potential security threats, including stricter immigration controls from countries deemed high risk. Nonetheless, South Korea has not been a primary target for international terrorism, and the country's immigration policies have traditionally been more focused on economic and demographic considerations rather than security threats from immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Saenuri Party has a conservative outlook that emphasizes national security, South Korea's context regarding immigration and terrorism is different from that of Western countries where such bans have been more debated. South Korea has a relatively low incidence of terrorism and a controlled immigration system. The party's policies have traditionally centered on North Korean threats rather than global terrorism. Therefore, while the party might not strongly oppose immigration, it is unlikely to strongly support a complete ban on immigrants from high-risk countries without considering the broader implications for international relations and the country's reputation. Moreover, the party's approach would likely be more nuanced, focusing on enhancing screening processes rather than implementing outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Saenuri Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.