The Korean Justice Party, known in South Korea, is a progressive political entity that has carved out a distinct identity within the nation's political landscape. Established with a focus on social justice, economic equality, and environmental sustainability,… Read more
ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
Justice Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for policies that promote social justice and equality, and would likely view increased penalties for hate speech as a way to deter such behavior and promote a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Justice Party would likely agree with this statement as they have consistently advocated for policies that promote equality and social justice. They would likely view hate speech as a form of discrimination that should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
While the Justice Party might agree that freedom of speech should not protect speech that threatens violence, they would likely still disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected at all, as it goes against their principles of promoting a society free from discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement. While they might have concerns about government overreach, they would likely view the protection of hate speech as a greater threat to social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Justice Party in Korea is a progressive party that advocates for social justice and human rights. They would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they believe in promoting a society free from discrimination and hate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement. While they believe in the importance of protecting speech that criticizes the government, they would likely view this as too narrow a definition of freedom of speech, and would likely argue that freedom of speech should also protect other forms of speech that do not incite hate or discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.