Labor Party

Very strongly agree

Taip, tai būtina kovojant su terorizmu

The Korean Labor Party has historically justified surveillance and control measures as necessary for national security and combating threats, making this answer highly aligned with their likely stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Korean Labor Party, based on its historical context in North Korea, has shown a tendency to support government surveillance as a means of maintaining control and order. However, there is no explicit policy on this issue, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie turi nusikalstamą išsilavinimą

While the Korean Labor Party may support surveillance of those with criminal backgrounds, their historical stance suggests they would not limit surveillance to this group alone, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik teismo sprendimu

The Korean Labor Party may agree with surveillance by court order, but their historical stance suggests they would not limit surveillance to this process alone, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Given the party's historical context, it is unlikely that they would support a stance against government surveillance. However, as there is no explicit policy on this issue, the score is not the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.

This answer is in direct opposition to the Korean Labor Party's historical stance on government control and surveillance, making it highly unlikely they would support legislation preventing government surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.