Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
Personal answerYes, Teachers as well as administrators and staff should be allowed but not required to carry concealed guns at school if they're legally allowed to do so other places |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
Personal answer不要让政府参与到婚姻里面,而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
Personal answer是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
Personal answer不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
移民 › 公民考试
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
Personal answer是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资 |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
Personal answerNo, I would prefer term limits instead |
Technology › Data Privacy
Personal answerCompanies should never be allowed to collect and use any personal data; however, increased regulations imposed by the government will only result in higher costs to the consumers. |
外交政策 › 外国选举
Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Personal answerNo, and I am skeptical about the viability of electric vehicles |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
Personal answer不,政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Personal answer不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answer不,政府在经济衰退期间应该大幅减少开支 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
Personal answerNo, neither the government nor businesses have the right to mandate/require vaccinations. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Backdoor Access to Encrypted Communications
Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
国家安全 › National Identification System
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 高速铁路
Personal answer不 |
医保 › Marketing Unhealthy Products to Youth
Personal answerNo, we should not be banning anything simply because some people don't agree with them. However, I do believe that the marketing and advertising industry has become too powerful as a driving force in every aspect of our personal lives. It would be better to eliminate advertising all together. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Housing › Rent Control
Personal answerNo, studies show that rent control does not lower rent |
教育 › University Debt Accountability
Personal answerNo, it is the student’s responsibility to manage their financial outcome |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Green Spaces
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
Personal answer是的 |
Technology › Cryptocurrencies
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answer不 |
科学 › CRISPR Technology
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answerAll advertising should be banned on social media. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安乐死
Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
Personal answerVaccination status is a matter of private health record and is protected by the doctor-patient relationship. |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Technology › 社交媒体监管
Personal answerNo, the government should not have the power or authority to interfere in business and free-market, but I do believe that the public has the right to know exactly how they are being maniputlated by the large tech companies. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
Personal answerNo, we should not get involved in this conflict |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
Personal answerNo, this is not a government decision nor is it a voter decision to then enforce on everyone. If companies and employers desire a four-day workweek, then they are free to choose what is best for themselves. Schools and institutions should be allowed the same freedom to choose. The small, family-owned business may not be able to survive on a four-day workweek with more government imposed taxes and fees. |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 关税
Personal answer不,全球自由贸易体系对我们的企业和消费者来说更好 |
罪行 › Criminal Justice Use of AI
Personal answerNo, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
外交政策 › AI Warfare Ethics
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
Personal answer应该,要对从政府那收到钱的所有人进行检查,包括雇员和政治家 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
交通运输 › Frequent Flier Regulation
Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › Congestion Pricing
Personal answer不 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2025 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.